Comments on: Prevention First Act http://www.whatthefoca.com/2009/02/prevention-first-act/ WTF? Fri, 21 Jan 2011 03:55:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Margot http://www.whatthefoca.com/2009/02/prevention-first-act/comment-page-1/#comment-88 Margot Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:56:10 +0000 http://www.whatthefoca.com/?p=153#comment-88 Lord, Have Mercy on our Country. In the Name Of Your Divine Son Jesus Stop the slaughter of your children. We pray for the radical conversion of our President Obama in the name of JESUS. amen Lord, Have Mercy on our Country. In the Name Of Your Divine Son Jesus Stop the slaughter of your children. We pray for the radical conversion of our President Obama in the name of JESUS. amen

]]> By: pete http://www.whatthefoca.com/2009/02/prevention-first-act/comment-page-1/#comment-87 pete Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:09:49 +0000 http://www.whatthefoca.com/?p=153#comment-87 Some of the logic in the bill is interesting. 50% of the unintentioned pregnancies are with women not using prevention. Does that mean that 50% of unintentioned pregnancies are with women using prevention? Also, it says that women who have unplanned pregnancies have a greater chance of being abused. Does that mean that the abuser boyfriend is a nice guy to non-pregnant women? There are many false logic statements and many assumptions and statements without basis. I think if people actually read this and FOCA, and understand how poorly logic is used, they may very well become pro-life. Be critical of what you read, don't just accept it. Some of the logic in the bill is interesting. 50% of the unintentioned pregnancies are with women not using prevention. Does that mean that 50% of unintentioned pregnancies are with women using prevention? Also, it says that women who have unplanned pregnancies have a greater chance of being abused. Does that mean that the abuser boyfriend is a nice guy to non-pregnant women? There are many false logic statements and many assumptions and statements without basis. I think if people actually read this and FOCA, and understand how poorly logic is used, they may very well become pro-life. Be critical of what you read, don’t just accept it.

]]> By: Kira Jannusch http://www.whatthefoca.com/2009/02/prevention-first-act/comment-page-1/#comment-86 Kira Jannusch Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:48:49 +0000 http://www.whatthefoca.com/?p=153#comment-86 Our definition of pregnancy is different from the medical definition, which is why they say it will prevent pregnancies. I just called the plan b information line and was connected to a nurse that said "pregnancy" is defined as implantation. So, if a newly fertilized egg is prevented from implanting, it is considered to be a prevented pregnancy, not an ended one. Our definition of pregnancy is different from the medical definition, which is why they say it will prevent pregnancies. I just called the plan b information line and was connected to a nurse that said “pregnancy” is defined as implantation. So, if a newly fertilized egg is prevented from implanting, it is considered to be a prevented pregnancy, not an ended one.

]]> By: Jamie Rucker http://www.whatthefoca.com/2009/02/prevention-first-act/comment-page-1/#comment-85 Jamie Rucker Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:01:05 +0000 http://www.whatthefoca.com/?p=153#comment-85 Harry Reid would sponsor a bill like this. I agree, how does distributing morning after pills prevent pregnancies? yes, it does end them but does not prevent them. Does anyone know how much money this bill is calling for and how much support it has? Harry Reid would sponsor a bill like this. I agree, how does distributing morning after pills prevent pregnancies? yes, it does end them but does not prevent them.

Does anyone know how much money this bill is calling for and how much support it has?

]]> By: Adam Morse http://www.whatthefoca.com/2009/02/prevention-first-act/comment-page-1/#comment-84 Adam Morse Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:10:24 +0000 http://www.whatthefoca.com/?p=153#comment-84 It's amazing that this "Prevention First" act, which I'm sure is designed to help reduce pregnancies, has so much involvement with the morning after pill, which would abort the baby AFTER the pregnancy has occurred! Such backward language these Democrats use. It’s amazing that this “Prevention First” act, which I’m sure is designed to help reduce pregnancies, has so much involvement with the morning after pill, which would abort the baby AFTER the pregnancy has occurred! Such backward language these Democrats use.

]]>